And everyone hee-hawed at me when post after post I repeated that Bush is a totally overhyped creation of the media. Leinart too. Jarrett too. Guess Whormoan is looking smarter by the week. The Saints won last yr because of Brees and despite Bush. They are losing this yr because Brees is playing like he did his rookie yr in San Diego - like doo doo. Bush is a complete non-factor and other d-coordinators are not gameplanning to stop him despite what you people with the sound up too high on the TV think.
Getting paid all that $$$. Doesn't return punts, doesn't return kicks. And when he does, no production.
I got you covered upstairs in the big boys room too
Right on! I'm not allowed to play with the big boys because of all my "negativity". Meanwhile most of my unpopular opinions were pretty accurate. Bush won the Heisman running circles around Fresno State. He's still trying to run in circles, but the LB's are as fast as him now. Are you starting to see the light or are you still in denial?
Your insults don't bother me in the least but your stupidity wins an award worth a knee jerk kick in the gut every time. But look at the Saints. You compare guys like Reggie Bush to a Deuce McAllister and think you know something nobody else knows.
Duh.
Try about 75 lbs difference between them and a frame like a Mack truck compared to a Ferrari. Put Deuce in the wide open, then he knocks down one player, 3 swarm him and next thing you know the whistle blows. But put Bush in the wide open and there's a decent chance he'll score on any given play. Or, you can run a guy like Bush up the middle and he gets noplace but not McAllister.
There's a light out there but it doesn't shine your way no matter how right you say or think you are.
whormoan,
Congrats on your Angels winning the division wager. I bumped the thread and forgot the hard on Wilheim has for you.
Who do you like in the Cal/Ore game sir?
Thanks, that was a soft line if I've ever seen one. Yeah, I don't know who's worse, Conan the lying, plagiarizing snitch or Wilhelm cow-towing to him. I see posts FAR worse than mine on a daily basis and they (rightfully so) are left alone
Anyways, as for the game. It's hard not to think Autzen will give Oregon a huge advantage. However, the current line of 6 is overly inflated. Not that Cal has proven anything, but Oregon less so. They let Houston run all over them, caught Michigan after the most depressing game in school history, and caught Fresno after a multiple OT game. Then they putzed around with Stanford for a half a la UCLA and let their back-up RB top 100 yards. On the flip side, can't put money on Cal either. Tedford has not won a non-bowl game as an underdog since '03.
So after all that, believe it or not, i think the best play in this game is the UNDER (72). Tedford's defense is banged up, and he has to know his only chance to win this game is to keep the score down by running the ball and controlling the clock. I see the winning team in the 30's, not the 40's.
Nice post jock. Maybe when you hit 30 yrs. and do little more growing you'll have the guts to post something with substance again in a sports forum. I can see your rehab isn't working so I won't hold my breath. You may never understand it. I don't care about your insults, and I never reported a single one. I care when you go in and mess up people's threads who have as much right to express their opinions as you do but your perverse needs inevitably lead to another gang bang and ruin thread after thread. Many take shots from time to time but you habitually rock the boat with it.